Park Journey
  • Home
  • Six Flags
  • Universal Studios
  • Disney Parks
  • SeaWorld Parks
  • Other Parks
  • Beyond The Parks
  • Industry News
  • Cruise Journey
  • Cedar Fair (Legacy)
  • Theme Park Art
  • The Other Side of the Tracks
  • Past Updates
    • 2021 Updates
    • 2020 Updates
    • 2019 Updates
    • 2018 Updates
    • 2017 Updates
    • 2016 Updates
    • 2015 Updates
    • 2013 and 2014 Updates
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Six Flags
  • Universal Studios
  • Disney Parks
  • SeaWorld Parks
  • Other Parks
  • Beyond The Parks
  • Industry News
  • Cruise Journey
  • Cedar Fair (Legacy)
  • Theme Park Art
  • The Other Side of the Tracks
  • Past Updates
    • 2021 Updates
    • 2020 Updates
    • 2019 Updates
    • 2018 Updates
    • 2017 Updates
    • 2016 Updates
    • 2015 Updates
    • 2013 and 2014 Updates
  • Contact Us
Search by typing & pressing enter

YOUR CART

12/8/2014 6 Comments

IntamIN and OUT - RD Sussman

EDITORIAL

That means this is the opinion of one person, not a trip report or news article. Please keep that in mind as you are reading. 
Picture
It's Monday, and RD is back with a topic that is sure to stir the pot and probably upset a lot of people. 

This week RD is discussing everybody's favorite ride manufacturer, Intamin and their seemingly uncanny ability to turn something amazing into something that doesn't work very well. 



Is this just the manufacturer doing what the park wants, rushed design and manufacturing or a combination. Read on to find out. - Gregg


For years now, Intamin has been losing ground in an ever changing battle of scale in the amusement industry. It hasn't always been the case. However, their decline is entirely on their shoulders, and for good reason. 
Picture
El Toro and Kingda Ka: Six Flags Great Adventure
Picture
Superman Ride of Steel: Six Flags America
Let's take a look at the rise & fall of Intamin's history. 

For those who don't already know, Intamin actually stands for INTernational AMusement INstallation. They were originally created as a way of marketing new rides all over the world at the dawn of the theme park explosion. 

Companies such as Haefma (River rapids & log rides), Giovanola (Coasters & ride technology) and the great Schwarzkopf (Coasters & flat rides) used Intamin as a way of selling their rides overseas. This was a very successful venture, filling parks with the latest in rides and manufacturers with an ever growing business. 

As Intamin grew, their desires to enter the ride building business grew as well. As Intamin began to work on their own rides, Giovanola was their primary contractor, developing & building their version of the Standup coaster as well as the fabled Space Diver coasters. 
Picture
Giant Drop: Six Flags Great America
Picture
Acrophobia: Six Flags Over Georgia
Intamin's first coasters were mostly smaller rides & spinning coasters. While designs were created by Intamin, Giovanola did their track bending & work, that is until they set up their own factories. The result of bringing this in-house was the spectacular Ride of Steel coasters, which combined speed, height & force changes that opened the eyes of many. Much like any firm does, these designs bred other similar coasters, growing in size, length & thrill elements along the way. Inversion coasters soon followed, leading to the eight & ten inversion coaster.

The drop tower was redeveloped from the original Giovanola systems into a true drop ride. Intamin began selling these as fast as they could make them, and in any size a park wanted.  
Picture
Superman: The Escape: Six Flags Magic Mountain
Picture
Superman: The Escape: Six Flags Magic Mountain
But the decline was already being rooted. Underengineered systems were notable among almost all of their attractions. Chain breaks were commonplace, even on new coasters. Downtime was notable beyond the norm. Technology was outpacing development's ability to keep up.

And then technology began to break: 
  • June 2007: A cable on the Kentucky Kingdom drop tower broke- severing a child's feet. Not long after, Port Aventura's own drop tower had a cable break, stranding riders on the side of the tower 
  • September 2009: Knott's Xcelerator had its own cable break - injuring two people
  • April 2010: Expedition GeForce derails on the lift hill after an axle break
  • February 2012: a girl dies in an accident at Hopi Hari, after a mechanical failure in a restraint latch
Picture
Xcelerator: Knott's Berry Farm
And then there were the engineering mistakes:
  • Volcano: The Blast coaster (1998/9 Kings Dominion): Underengineered LSM systems used to launch the ride failed to provide enough force for a full train to operate, resulting in a removal of half the seats from the ride. Later updates and more powerful LSM allowed the original 16 seat configuration to be used. 
  • Maverick (2007, Cedar Point) Originally designed with a heartline roll, forces that were not calculated upon during engineering were deemed too extreme for riders, and the heartline roll was removed. 
  • Intimidator 305 (2010, Kings Dominion) After a year of operation, the ride's first turn was altered & elevated to reduce forces associated with the ride's turnaround after the first drop. 
Picture
Intimidator 305: Kings Dominion
Picture
Volcano The Blast Coaster: Kings Dominion
Intamin's reputation for thrills is among the best. Their reputation for quality is among the worst. Looking at their track record, it shows a consistent inconsistency: Odds are that if you've bought an Intamin ride, it is going to have a serious mechanical issue within the first few years. In some cases rides have required serious design changes to alter the track profile or ride mechanisms. 

In an era when parks (and their riders) are demanding better quality & comfort from their rides, the levels of quality are diminishing greatly. Painful rides such as Green Lantern (SFMM) have earned a reputation for great discomfort. And quality being as bad as it is results in downtime - a black eye on Intamin & the park that has installed one of their attractions. 
Picture
Green Lantern First Flight: Six Flags Magic Mountain
What went wrong? How did a company rooted in quality builders & trades go so poorly so quickly? Why are new rides requiring expensive & time consuming alterations?
Part of this has to do with rushing through a ride's creation & building. Being able to develop & build a ride in less than 12 months is a tight schedule all around, and results in quality control being shoddy, and corners being cut. 

Poor engineering is to blame for some of the issues. Failing to note possible issues in forces is an inexcusible failure of somebody to control the design - and present possible issues to potential owners of new attractions. 
Picture
Skyrush: Hersheypark
Picture
Storm Runner: Hersheypark
So what to do with Intamin? They have pushed the envelope - and that is a great thing. But their quality has suffered at the hands of this. 

First, they need to put better quality control & design to good practice. Other manufacturers have surpassed their quality several times over - and it shows. B&M, MACK, Zierer & others produce rides that are quality installations from day one. Intamin has a reputation that is well earned for building a ride - then spending months tuning it and altering it to fix issues, often at the cost of time & lost revenue to a park. 

Second, process control must be applied - parks will not spend money unless Intamin spends money. By developing a better product through process will pay yields. Building quality rides that will last a long time is a good start, one that will build to better reputation, and better design processes.
We have seen too many good manufacturers go by the wayside due to issues with building rides. Intamin's legendary development is in danger of going that route unless they rebuild their quality- and their reputation.


If you enjoyed this update please share with your friends and make sure you "like" us on Facebook and "follow" us on Twitter and Instagram. 

If you have any comments, please share them below. 
6 Comments
Tim
12/8/2014 01:58:56 am

First of all, GeForce never derailed...when the axle broke, the train was still on the tracks before it came to a grinding halt. Maybe I'm being too literal, but for me, derail means coming off the rails. I could be wrong. Plus, adding Great to Schwarzkopf is a bit biased, even if they have an exceptional track record (no pun intended).

Reply
R.D.
12/8/2014 02:39:09 am

Tim, derailed is a term used to describe when a car or train has left the track course of the ride - however minor. In the case of Expedition GeForce, the axle sheared, and the car did leave that course of track (Look at the pictures of the incident to see where the car was no longer being supported by the track rails - and instead was relying on the cars in front of & behind to stay in place).

And there is no questioning of Schwarzkopf being great.

Reply
anonyme
12/8/2014 05:06:57 am

Déar Park Journéy,

I am désigner indépéndant workéd with différént amusémént sociétés. The informations présénté in thé magaziné is not factuél. I would suggést a rémoval. It will not upsét a lot of péoples but may bé an émbarrassmént for vous magaziné.

Reply
R.D.
12/8/2014 06:55:02 am

Everything in this Opinion/Editorial is fact checked several times over for accuracy, clarity & usage. All of the incidents mentioned involved Intamin's product line, their rides & their systems. Any items that I considered to be in a grey area of issue/fault were removed before publication in the best attempt to deliver an Opinion/Editorial piece that provides as much fact & clarity as possible.

I think my readers & my publisher deserve the best and most accurate writing & reporting that I can give them. As a writer, it goes against my own beliefs to use trumped-up or improper facts or evidence to the audience. That is paramount to lying to my audience and to my publisher, and goes against everything I hold as ethical and moral.

R.D.

Reply
Steve Haskell
12/8/2014 02:46:16 pm

Hi RD,

As always respect your opinion and enjoyed the read. If companies like Intamin did not push the envelope then it would all get kind of boring (B&M) wouldn't it? Maverick and I305 are both top ten in my books and Volcano is also a winner. From a consumer's POV Intamin is the holy grail. From a park making an investment I cannot answer for. But if you build it, I will travel the world to ride it. So that says something.

Reply
R.D.
12/8/2014 04:16:18 pm

And I agree with Intamin pushing the envelope - they have done a lot of things others have dared not to do (namely the accelerator coasters as well as their re-think on the LSM system rides). And they produce rides that draw crowds. When they're running.

Schwarzkopf, MACK, Zierer, B&M and many others have also pushed the envelope - and at the same time delivered groundbreaking rides that were reliable from day one. I don't know about you, but it took me nearly a decade to ride Superman at SFMM due to the hefty downtime that ride has been hit with over the lifespan of the ride. And I've still yet to ride HersheyPark's Storm Runner - despite 10 visits to the park since it opened 10 years ago - all due to mechanical issues with the ride at the time. If I traveled the distance you would to ride it, I'd expect it to be open & running at capacity instead of being broken or waiting for something to be replaced.

Intamin needs to balance the scale - building ground breaking rides is one thing they do well - but reliability & durability they have been doing poorly on in the past 10 years. That needs to change - or we won't have an Intamin to do the groundbreaking rides - as nobody will buy them, preferring to go with a competitor's safe design that will work properly from the first time it is operated.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    December 2024
    August 2022
    October 2021
    July 2021
    April 2021
    February 2021
    June 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    September 2018
    June 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    October 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014

    RSS Feed